Gay and Lesbian Adoption

Gay and Lesbian Adoption Argumentative Emily Stroud School Abstract Lesbian and gay adoption has been widely controversial across the globe. This social issue is tremendously discussed by religious, political and social groups which have been providing numerous statistics, figures and major researches on the effects of same sex couples to the mental and emotional growth of children. At the inception of the 21st century, many countries have shifted and adjusted to different kind of perspective. Many government leaders have actually allowed same sex marriages as well gay and lesbian adoption.This paper aims to provide the readers some facts and research studies concerning the impact of same sex couples to the upbringing of their adopted children. This paper intends to open the minds of the audience concerning both sides of the issue. The paper does not provide any preference or does not promote any viewpoint relating to religious teaching or significant educational research. The information regarding same sex adoption is presented below and depends on one’s perspective whether or not to consider it acceptable on your standards and morals. IntroductionLesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) adoption or same sex adoption has been considered legal during the inception of the 21st century. There is a growing number of jurisdictions in United States and countries which have recently altered their decisions concerning the legalization of gay adoption although majority of the Asian nations remain unyielding to this controversial legislative act. Gay and lesbian adoption is to a great extent debatable. Currently, many religious groups and conservative individuals are asserting powerful remarks and convincing rationalization on why this kind of adoption should not be permissible.On the other hand, significant research studies published by notable health institutions revealed the positive impact of the same sex couples on adopted children. This paper will present the rationale of advocacy and opposition on gay and lesbian adoption. Opposition on Gay and Lesbian adoption Same sex adoption is highly disputed in many countries. Religion appears to be the major factor that affects the legislative decision of the government of uncompromising nations. Immorality serves to be the leading basis to this social predicament.Many families have preset beliefs that parenting is a serious and important factor in a child’s way of thinking and feeling. A strong family plays a tremendous factor in influencing the perspectives and supporting the emotional sufferings of a child in relation to this standpoint, a normal family constitutes a father and mother. Religion brings stigma to a family comprised of two males or two females. “The Catholic Church and conservative Protestants remain opposed to gay adoption with one Protestant leader saying it harms kids because it intentionally creates motherless or fatherless families” (Peoples, ; Bailey, 2011, p. 76). The views of religious leaders and teachings of the sacred scriptures have some bearing on the cultural values and beliefs of many individuals. The society has drastically situated religion on top of its way of life and as an outcome, the philosophy of most people highly relied on its ideas and long-established principles. Typically, the morals and mindset of a person are drawn from one’s education and experiences in life; usually, the basic learning of a person spring from religion and family values. In a nutshell, going against the teachings of one’s religion is considered morally wrong.Religious leaders highly gainsay on lesbian and gay adoption since they extremely believe that the parenting of a male and female is beyond compare. The parental care and affection of gay and lesbian couples cannot surpass the security and protection shared by heterosexual couples. Another reason for the opposition of society towards gay and lesbian adoption is the volatility of same sex relationships. Many same sex couples do not last for more than 10 years in relationship without getting involved in extramarital affairs.Majority of gay couples resorted to moving from one relationship to another in a few years time while lesbian couples have been observed to have major issues resulting to violence and depression. “Non-heterosexual couples are less stable than heterosexual couples in their relationships and they are more likely to separate; violence is substantially higher in non-heterosexual relationships” (Byrd, 2008). A large number of research studies have been conducted pertaining to the attitudes and struggles of third sex couples.It has been strictly observed that the culture of gay and lesbian couples is characterized to be highly disconnected from the mainstream society. These couples are usually illustrated to be often engaged in sexual experimentation and strongly affected by relationship failures. Homosexuals seemed to prioritize their connectedness to the gay subculture and their parenting responsibilities may be neglected. According to Greenan, & Tunnell (2003) “some gay men do not want to give up their non-monogamy once they are in a long-term relationship because being sexually free is something of a badge of membership in the gay culture” (p. 98). Most homosexual couples are more likely associated to the customs and practices of their community and they may not notice that their adopted children may be overlooked. They usually focus their time on their relationship issues which lead them to commit aggressive and violent acts as well as get involved to substance abuse. Sometimes, the pressure of dwelling in two cultures particularly mainstream culture and alternative lifestyle indirectly brings psychological effect to the gay and lesbian couples.Most couples are unable to bear the tension and discrimination experienced in the workplace and in the community and as a negative result, they seemed to be unqualified to serve as effective and supportive parents since some require psychological counseling and emotional support due to incapability to handle too much bigotry both in the community and workplace. A major basis of antagonism with respect to gay and lesbian adoption is the high possibility that the children may experience confusion on their sexuality. The actions and decisions made by most children are derived on what they often witnessed at home.Member of the Family Research Council, Tim Dailey asserted that “homosexual households do not recruit children into a similar lifestyle however they are more likely to engage in sexual experimentation and homosexual behavior” (Moe, 1998, p. 66). At an early age, children are exposed to immoral acts and they tend to accept the idea of alternative lifestyle. Children may not know the long-established value of traditional family and they may also be somewhat enticed to attempt to follow the trails of their gay parents. Advocacy on Gay and Lesbian adoptionDeprivation of basic human rights is among the most important rationale to the advocacy of society on gay and lesbian adoption. The society should not disregard the fact that homosexuals are also humans. People regardless of sexual orientation have equal rights in the legal system. As a free country, the United States ought not to turn its back on the civil rights of its citizens whether heterosexual or homosexual. If the society highly casts off discrimination on the homosexuals then they should allow these people to live freely and choose whatever lifestyle they desire as long as they do not intervene with someone’s private lives.The judicial courts have a high propensity to grant gay and lesbian adoption. According to Mucciaroni (2008), “decisions about adoptions must be made on a case-by-case basis since family law is characterized by more discretion than any other field of private law because of the need to tailor legal resolutions to the unique circumstances of each individual and family (p. 151). The political aspect significantly considers the benefits of lesbian and gay adoption to orphaned children. The family law formulated by the American Constitution does not take sides on whom to grant parenting rights.Children and parents whether homosexual or heterosexual in nature vary in emotional, physical, monetary and psychological needs as well as racial and family background; it depends on the discretion of the assigned judge whether the same sex couple has the right capacity to fulfill their obligations as suitable parents to orphaned children. Another major reason on advocacy towards gay and lesbian adoption is the truth about the unavoidable tendency of heterosexual couples to separate. Christian Right psychologist Paul Cameron had been fabricating researches concerning the impact of gay couples to adopted children. Cameron’s studies which were based on deeply flawed research methodologies have purported to show that homosexuals are ten to twenty times more likely to be child molesters and likely to commit bestiality” (Brint, 2009, p. 232). Aside from the fact that heterosexual couples resort also to divorces and legal separation, there are also cases of sexual molestation and negligence being committed. The society should open its eyes on the fact that separation of couples is an ordinary occurrence. Infidelity and relationship problems do not only transpire among homosexual couples.The society should not deprive homosexuals from their right to adoption since they are also akin with heterosexuals who have the penchant to commit blunders and transgressions to their lifetime partners. The society should not be too inequitable about seeing the peccadillo and gaffes of the homosexual couples. The society should refrain from being biased about the faux pas perpetrated by lesbians and gay couples because such acts are also being pulled off by heterosexual couples. Support for same sex adoption is beneficial to foster care agencies.In addition to this, orphaned children are bestowed with better future since they will be provided with superior education and loving attention instead of remaining in the custody of social workers. Supervision of children is not greatly concentrated when they remain in the non-profit agencies compared to the attention provided by homosexual couples who are highly interested in having children of their own. According to a study conducted by the Evan B. Donaldson adoption Institute, allowing homosexual couples to dopt children lessens the strain on the nation’s foster care network and saves a significant amount of money” (Mulcahy, 2009). Children raised by lesbian and gay parents think and act normally just like children brought up by heterosexual couples. According to Riedmann, Lamanna, & Nelson, (2002), “research from an accumulation of more than 100 studies finds children of gay male and lesbian parents to be well-adjusted, with no noticeable differences from children of heterosexual parents” (p. 329). The society should discard the old notion that children nurtured and cared for by homosexual parents act and feel oddly.Based on the study of Clark (2009), “most research on lesbian couples conclude that the stability of the parents’ relationship not their sexual orientation determines the quality of the child’s upbringing” (p. 73). Conclusion The issue on gay and lesbian adoption is being continuously talked about in most countries. In reference to the opposition of same sex couples, religious traditions and practices appeared to be the prevailing idea why society is adamant to this social issue. Furthermore, pediatrics believed that same sex couples have great propensity to separate and tendencies for violence.Also, another major counter point for the aforementioned argument is the belief of sexual confusion of adopted children. With respect to the advocacy on same sex adoption, deprivation of human rights as a kind of discrimination and the study made by Evan B. Donaldson adoption Institute supersedes the idea of sexual confusion among adopted children of same sex couples. The fact that heterosexual couples have tendency to legally separate or annul their marriage confirms the idea that gay couples should not be disapprove of parenting rights. References Brint, S. G. (2009).Evangelicals and democracy in America: 2. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Byrd, A. (2008, September 3). Pediatrics group endorses homosexual adoption … but new policy places children at risk. Retrieved from http://www. narth. com/docs/endorses. html Clark, R. A. (2009). Planning parenthood: Strategies for success in fertility assistance, adoption, and surrogacy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Greenan, D. E. , & Tunnell, G. (2003). Couple therapy with gay men. Guilford family therapy series. New York: Guilford Press. Moe, B. A. (1998). Adoption: A reference handbook.Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO. Mucciaroni, G. (2008). Same sex, different politics: Success and failure in the struggles over gay rights. Chicago studies in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mulcahy, J. (2009, December 24). The Effects of Gay Adoption. Retrieved from http://www. livestrong. com/article/67463-effects-gay-adoption/ Peoples, J. , & Bailey, G. (2011). Humanity: An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub. Co. Riedmann, A. C. , Lamanna, M. A. , & Nelson, A. (2002). Marriages and families. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning. [pic] ———————– 9

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *